Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule and PAMA
Medicare pays for nearly every test a small lab runs from one national price list, the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule. Since 2018 those prices come from what private payors pay, reported by labs under PAMA. Here is how the rates are set, where to find the current file, which labs must report, and what the 2026 law and the preliminary 2027 rates mean for you. Every figure was read from CMS and the eCFR on 23 October 2026.

How far a rate can fall, year by year
Since PAMA tied Medicare's lab rates to private payor prices in 2018, Congress has capped how much any one test's rate may drop below the year before, and has rewritten that cap several times since.
- a rate may fall up to 15% that year
- up to 10%
- no cut allowed
- 2018up to 10%
- 2019up to 10%
- 2020up to 10%
- 2021no cut
- 2022no cut
- 2023no cut
- 2024no cut
- 2025no cut
- 2026no cut
- 2027up to 15%
- 2028up to 15%
- 2029up to 15%
2018–2025: § 414.507(d). 2026–2029: CMS's CLFS page under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, § 6226: "There's no phase-in reduction in 2026. Beginning January 1, 2027 - 2029, payment may not be reduced by more than 15% percent per year". Both read 2026-10-23.

How Medicare pays for lab tests
Medicare Part B pays for clinical diagnostic laboratory tests from one national list, the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (CLFS). Section 216 of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA) changed how that list is set: since January 1, 2018, rates rest on "the weighted median of private payor rates" (81 FR 41036). Before PAMA, CMS says, a test was generally paid the lesser of the billed charge, the contractor's fee schedule or a national limitation amount (CMS fact sheet).
the weighted median is calculated by arraying the distribution of all private payor rates, weighted by the volume for each payor and each laboratory.
Three consequences follow from the regulation. A rate is national: it is "not subject to any adjustment, such as geographic, budget neutrality, annual update, or other adjustment" (§ 414.507(c)). It holds for three calendar years for most tests and one year for advanced diagnostic laboratory tests (§ 414.507(a)). And a test with no private payor data is priced by crosswalking to a similar test or, failing that, by gapfilling, where the MACs develop the amount (MLN006818).
What the 2026 schedule pays for tests a small lab runs every day:
| Code | Test, in plain words | 2026 rate |
|---|---|---|
| 36415 | Blood draw by venipuncture (the collection fee) | $9.34 |
| 85025 | Complete blood count with automated differential | $7.77 |
| 80053 | Comprehensive metabolic panel | $10.56 |
| 80061 | Lipid panel | $13.39 |
| 83036 | Hemoglobin A1c | $9.71 |
| 84443 | Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) | $16.80 |
| 87880 | Rapid strep A antigen, read by eye | $16.53 |
| G0480 | Definitive drug testing, 1 to 7 drug classes | $114.43 |
CMS fee file 26CLABQ4 (CY 2026, quarter 4), read 2026-10-23. The collection fee is paid in addition to the test (CPT 36415).
Drug testing shows the spread inside one schedule. The definitive tiers run from G0480 at $114.43 for 1 to 7 drug classes up to G0483 at $246.92 for 22 or more, and a presumptive cup read by eye (80305) pays $12.60. If you bill those, our toxicology LIS comparison covers the systems that track them.
Where current rates are published
CMS posts the schedule as a downloadable file on its CLFS files page and replaces it each quarter. The one in force today is 26CLABQ4, the fourth quarter of 2026, which "includes all changes identified in CR 14569"; MLN Matters MM14569 explains that update in plain words. The file lists 2,117 codes on 2,243 lines: a code that has a waived version appears twice, once plain and once with the QW modifier at the same rate (how QW works).
Each line carries the year, the HCPCS code, any modifier, the effective date and the rate. The descriptors in the file are CPT text under AMA copyright, which is why lab price lists and billing systems keep the code and write their own names. Medicare Advantage plans and commercial payers set their own fees, so this file is Medicare Part B's price, not the market's.
Takeaway

What PAMA reporting asks
PAMA turns some labs into data sources. An "applicable laboratory" must report its private payor rates; everyone else must not. Under § 414.502 it is a CLIA laboratory that bills Medicare Part B under its own NPI (a hospital outreach lab: bill type 14x), receives "more than 50 percent of its Medicare revenues" from the CLFS and the physician fee schedule, and receives "at least $12,500 of its Medicare revenues" from the CLFS. CMS's quick reference guide for physician office labs (April 2026) turns that into five questions. One "no" ends it: not an applicable lab, do not report.
- 1Does the lab hold a CLIA certificate, a certificate of waiver included?
- 2Does it have its own NPI, or share one with the physician or the practice? Either way, that NPI is the one tested.
- 3Does that NPI bill Medicare Part B?
- 4Majority of Medicare revenues: is CLFS plus physician fee schedule revenue more than 50% of the NPI's total Medicare revenue?
- 5Low expenditure threshold: did the NPI receive at least $12,500 from the CLFS in the data collection period?
Question 1 counts a certificate of waiver. Unsure which certificate your lab holds or needs? The CLIA certificate finder answers it from the test menu, and how to get a CLIA certificate walks through applying.
Five yeses and the lab is applicable and must report. For a practice whose lab shares the group NPI, physician fee schedule revenue counts in the numerator, so the majority test rarely screens it out and the $12,500 floor does the real sorting.
What gets reported is "applicable information": each private payor rate for which final payment was made in the data collection period, the volume paid at that rate, and the HCPCS code, leaving out capitated payments. Private payors are health insurers, group health plans, Medicare Advantage plans and Medicaid managed care plans. The reporting entity is the TIN-level organization, and its President, CEO or CFO, or a delegate who reports to one, signs a certification that the data are "accurate, complete, and truthful" (§ 414.504(d)).
Not reporting has a price
For a failure to report, or a misrepresentation or omission, the Secretary "may apply a civil monetary penalty to a reporting entity in an amount of up to $10,000 per day", as adjusted for inflation, for each failure (§ 414.504(e)).
PAMA after the 2026 law
CMS's summary of the current law: "On February 3, 2026, Section 6226 of the CAA, 2026 was passed". It moved the data collection period to January 1–June 30, 2025 and the reporting period to May 1–July 31, 2026, which has now ended. "There's no phase-in reduction in 2026. Beginning January 1, 2027 - 2029, payment may not be reduced by more than 15% percent per year" (CMS CLFS page). Rates are then updated every three years.
On September 21, 2026 CMS posted preliminary 2027 rates built from that report:
Of the codes with a median, 1,171 came in lower than today's rate, 169 equal and 186 higher. The 15% cap turns a deep drop into a three-year walk down. A made-up example: a test paying $20.00 in 2026 whose new median is $12.00 can fall to $17.00 in 2027, $14.45 in 2028 and $12.28 in 2029, each step 15% below the year before.
The eCFR text has not caught up
As of eCFR's 13 October 2026 issue, § 414.502 still defines the latest reporting period as January 1–March 31, 2026 on 2019 data, and § 414.507(d) still lists a 15% cap for 2026. CMS's pages, the March 2026 MLN fact sheet and CR 14569 all apply the 2026 law. Read the CMS page, not the regulation text, for dates.
Takeaway
What it means for a small lab
- Decide applicable status in writing for every data collection period, with the revenue figures behind each of the five answers kept on file.
- Watch the final 2027 rates. The preliminary medians are posted on the CLFS & PAMA reporting page; the 15% cap limits how far any one code moves in a year.
- Keep the fee tables current. A billing system that prices from an old quarter can misprice new codes and miss QW lines. Ask how vendors load the quarterly file in lab billing software compared and XiFin vs TELCOR, or what an outside firm handles in lab billing companies compared.